Showing posts with label upgrade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label upgrade. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Are Nikon Distortion Control Data firmware updates critical?

Question

Nikon has released the Distortion control data upgrade for D90 and D5000 (I am an owner of Nikon D90).

The Distortion Control Data firmware upgrade is available for Nikon D90 and D5000 cameras only. This is used to correct barrel and pincushion distortion during shooting and editing. This may be loaded into cameras that support distortion control.

Has anyone upgraded his/here camera by using this firmware? Is it a critical "bug"? Has somebody seen any difference before and after?

Other updates we can see here.

Related article: Where can I find firmware updates for Nikon and how do I install them

Asked by garik

Answer

No, I don't think it's a critical bug. This is an update of distortion data for Nikon lenses. As far as I know, the distortion correction is applied through the retouch menu, which I never use - I do any distortion corrections in Camera Raw.

The corrections applied are noticeable, if you see the before and after, but unless you see them on top of one another, or have an image of something like a brick wall, it's usually very hard to see distortion in most images, apart from very wide angle lenses.

Answered by MikeW

Friday, March 16, 2012

What factors should I consider to decide if it's worth upgrading to a “pro” level DSLR?

Question

I'm looking at upgrading from a Canon T2i to a Canon 7D. It's available used for half-price from a friend of mine because he purchased a Canon 5D Mark III.

The T2i and 7D have the exact same sensor, so I'd expect the image size, video size, sensitivity to light, etc. to all be the same. However, the faster focus and more focus points, faster shutter, weather sealing, double the FPS when shooting in RAW, top-facing LCD and 100% viewfinder were impressive upgrades to me.

I've always heard that you should upgrade your glass before upgrading your body, and I am also considering getting a new, expensive lens. I have an inexpensive Canon 50mm f/1.8 and a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, but am considering getting a 70-200mm f/2.8.

In general - and in this specific case - what should I consider beyond cost and specifications in deciding whether it's worth it to upgrade?

EDIT: Sorry for such a vague question everyone, but I do appreciate everyone's responses. I will be using the camera for "burst rate and the ability to sustain it, better AF, and better high ISO response", "professional controls", and so on, so yes it will be "worth it".

This question would have been better suited for "chat", as I know the technical differences and why I'll be using the 7D, I just wanted to hear some opinions and this website isn't meant for opinions per se.

I just wasn't sure if there was any advice from experts that said "No, I should buy a 4-year old camera," "especially if the sensor is the same between the two cameras," and of the like.

The camera is $1799 CDN with a battery grip ($199 CDN) and will be purchasing it for $1000 CDN.

Asked by Brett Alton

Answer

Nobody's actually asking what you use the camera for, so there's no way to tell whether or not the upgrade will benefit you.

I recently bought a T3i to be a second body along with a 7D; buying a second 7D seemed overkill for what I was using it for. Whether upgrading to the 7D makes sense depends on what you're doing with it.

How often do you hit a situation where you can't get the shot you want because your gear didn't cooperate? Are you shooting situations where a high, sustained burst rate would help get the shot? (like motor sports, birds, running animals, etc?). Are you shooting things where improved Autofocus will help you get shots your missing? Are you running into low-light situations where shots are ruined by high ISO noise?

If neither of those is true, then upgrading to the 7D probably won't help you a lot. The t2i does a nice job and turns out a quality image in most situations, and in those cases, I'd be wary spending money on an upgraded body. You definitely would benefit from buying upgraded glass, and that might be a better investment.

From a pure money standpoint, though, if you can get the 7D for half list and it's in good shape, that's a really good deal for a used body like that -- and it might make sense to do and sell the T2i, knowing that in a few years, you can probably sell the 7D again and get a good deal off your friend's willingness to part at a good price.

My guess is that since you aren't explaining technical reasons why the 7D would improve your photography, it probably won't. The image improvement between a T2i and a 7D is noticable but not huge, and you'd see more of an improvement upgrading your glass. Unless you need/want a feature the 7D has that the entry level body doesn't, it's hard to justify doing the upgrade -- and IMHO, the big changes between the bodies are burst rate and the ability to sustain it, better AF, and better high ISO response. If any of those are significant in your shooting, then maybe. Otherwise, seriously consider upgrading your lenses first.

Answered by chuqui

Monday, March 12, 2012

Is there anything to watch out for when upgrading Lightroom 3 to 4?

Question

If I decided to take the plunge and upgrade from LR3 to LR4, does LR4 manage the migration of my catalogs for me automatically, when opening it for first time? Are there any things that break or that you wish you'd been aware of before upgrading? Obviously the safest thing to do is to take a backup of my catalogs before upgrading, but it'd be good to know if there are any "gotchas".

Asked by ninesided

Answer

There is a bug in Lightroom 4 that can cause you to lose your point tone curve settings in existing images, as detailed here. This is a serious bug, if you use point curves. There are other relatively minor issues detailed at that link as well.

The behavior of Pick/Reject flags changes in Lightroom 4. Now when you flag an image, the flag is global, instead of per-collection. This can be surprising if you depend on per-collection flags.

Otherwise, I don't think there are serious issues. As you say, make backups. Your images that you've already processed will still be PV2010 (the Lightroom 3 process version) in Lightroom 4. You have to specifically upgrade them to PV2012 if you want to try the new process, because there's usually some degree of fine-tuning required. If you don't upgrade the process, they should remain identical to they way they were in Lightroom 3.

Answered by coneslayer

Monday, December 5, 2011

Will I see a significant improvement from upgrading from Canon EOS 350D to 550D?

Question

I am an enthusiastic amateur photographer and have a Canon 350 D that I bought about 5 years back. I use this with a Tamron 17-50 2.8 lens, a Canon 50 mm 1.8 mm lens and a Canon 70-200 f 4.0 L lens (with a Canon 1.4 X extender). I like to do some bird photography and also landscapes. I am wondering if my camera body is dated now and if that is the limiting factor for the quality of images that I get from my telephoto L lens. How much improvement in image quality can I expect if I upgrade to EOS 550 D (which I can afford now)? Will the newer sensor and larger number of pixels translate into a noticeable improvement in image quality?

Answer

The difference can be huge or unnoticeable depending on how you use the camera - for example, the faster burst rate means nothing if you never use burst mode or can make a huge difference if you always shoot in burst mode - also better low light performance means nothing if you always shoot in bright sunlight.

You shouldn't be asking if the camera body is a limiting factor - you should be asking yourself what it is you don't like about your photos and then ask here how to fix the problem (and most likely the way to fix the specific problem does not require a new camera body).

But buying equipment is fun, you can always use the specs to rationalize buying a new body - just think of that wonderful full HD video of birds in flight you can make with the 550D (Important note: I believe shooting video of birds in flight with a DSLR is insanely difficult)

BTW: I have the 550D and I love it, I use it mostly indoors at higher ISO than people here are usually comfortable with and it produces great pictures.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

How can I decide which lens to prioritize between Tokina 11-16 or Canon 15-85?

Question

I currently have a Canon T3i with a 50mm f1/8, 18-55 kit, and 55-250 f/4.0-5.6. I love the 50, but outside of setup shots, I seem to grab the 18-55 mostly just for the flexibility. (Mostly used on the wide end.) For my next lens, I'm torn between a Tokina 11-16 2.8 (fast, sharp, and wide) and the Canon 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS (USM and flexible).

I only have enough budgeted before my next trip (San Francisco) for one lens, and I'm torn. I probably won't bring every lens with me when travelling, which has me leading toward the 15-85; my question is more: so is there anything I'm missing or should consider? This will be my first "quality" glass. I don't plan on going full frame any time soon. I could just rent both lens for a few day and see which I like more; but that would delay the next purchase....

Of note: I don't plan on bringing a tripod or monopod with me while travelling, which means either wider aperture (2.8 on Tokina) or IS (15-85) would make a big difference when shooting night/indoors... I don't know which would work out better for me.

Answer

Look through your recent photos. Which scenes could have been captured better if they had been shot with one of the candidates? Also, think of photos that you could have taken, but didn't even try due to limitations of your gear. Ditto with ideas that you could turn into photos in future. Which lens would help you with those?

Pick the lens that will bring you more good photos.

Which lens upgrade? (Tokina 11-16 or Canon 15-85)

Question

I currently have a t3i with a 50 f1/8, 18-55 kit; and 55-250 f/4.0-5.6. I love the 50, but outside of setup shots; I seem to grab the 18-55 mostly just for the flexibility (Mostly used on the wide end). For my next lens; I'm torn between a Tokina 11-16 2.8 (fast, sharp, and wide) and the Canon 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS (USM and Flexibility)

I only have enough budgeted before my next trip (San Francisco) for one lens; and I'm torn. I probably won't bring every lens with me when travelling; which has me leading toward the 15-85; my question is more so is there anything I'm missing/should consider? This will be my first "quality" glass. I don't plan on going full frame any time soon. I could just rent both lens for a few day and see which I like more; but that would delay the next purchase... :)

edit For note; I don't plan on bringing a tripod or monopod with me while travelling; which means either wider aperture (2.8 on tokina) or IS (15-85) would make a big difference when shooting night/indoors... I don't know which would work out better for me..

Answer

Look through your recent photos. Which scenes could have been captured better if they had been shot with one of the candidates? Also, think of photos that you could have taken, but didn't even try due to limitations of your gear. Ditto with ideas that you could turn into photos in future. Which lens would help you with those?

Pick the lens that will bring you more good photos.

Sunday, July 10, 2011

Is it safe to perform a firmware upgrade on a Canon 60D camera?

Question

How safe is it to perform a firmware upgrade on a camera? I know what firmware upgrade is and what advantages/possible disadvantages it brings, I'm just specifically asking how safe or unsafe it is to perform one.

Can something go wrong? What should I double-check before performing an upgrade?

Answer

I trust Canon is sane enough and tests all official firmware upgrades not to brick your camera. As long as you follow the guide that comes with the firmware (instructions like "don't remove battery during upgrade") you should be completely safe.