Showing posts with label camera. Show all posts
Showing posts with label camera. Show all posts

Thursday, May 3, 2012

What type of cameras are best for low-maintenance time-lapse videos?

Question

There are a ton of videos on YouTube where people have high-speed time-lapse videos of themselves driving from like NYC to LA. I am not sure what they are using? Because the camera stays on overnight/when the vehicle is off? Also the quality of the images is really good. Do you know how to achieve this? What puzzles me is where do you find a memory card which can store 40-50 hours worth of video without any interru

Asked by antonpug

Answer

My suggestion is a little bit involved, but in my experience in this field of photography is the way to go.

You need:

  1. A net book with a good battery life (get an SSD hard disk so the battery life is further improved) (mine lasts for 7 hours) you could get even more if you setup the power options and disable the screen
  2. A HD web cam
  3. A copy of http://www.nimisis.com/projects/flix.php
  4. A DC to AC car charger (charge in the day when the car is running)
  5. Plan the trip - if you want to get through the night and into the morning and sun rise - you need to drive into the night and then wake up before the power on the net book goes and drive through the sun rise
  6. Some sort camouflage to hide the cam and net book when the car is unattended (don't over heat the net book)

I know that’s a lot of kit for a time lapse but its all reusable and solves several of your problems

  • Space - not an issue with a hard drive really
  • Battery life - a laptop battery life far out guns a camera

This is one of the best guides on the net for time lapses.

If your interested What settings should I use for a timelapse of my wedding? is a time lapse I did of my wedding which was well over 15 hours of coverage

Good luck!

Answered by Rob

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Is there any wifi enabled shockproof (i.e rugged) digital camera?

Question

Suppose I need to take photos everyday and upload them to pc wirelessly. I don't want to use extra eyefi sd card for that. Thanks for your help.

Asked by newcomer

Answer

Using an 'eyefi' add in card would give you maximum flexibility in camera choice as the majority of cameras do not have integral WiFi and you are very greatly limiting your choice this way.

HOWEVER

Depending on application, an excellent sounding candidate is Ricoh's G700SE

Ricoh G700SE home page

Specifications

Features page including -

  • Despite its small size and light weight, the G700SE has strengthened glass at the lens front surface and body protectors added at strategic points. This toughness enabled it to withstand 2.0 m drops in 26 positions (6 surfaces, 8 corners, and 12 edges) in testing conforming to US Department of Defense “MIL Standard 810F.” Furthermore, it also passes this test with the power on.

  • Bluetooth & WiFi, plus GPS and barcode options.

  • Introduced in late 2010. 12 megapixel,

  • Shockproof, dustproof, and waterproof to about 16 feet and chemical resistant for industrial usage.

  • 28 -140mm (f/3.5-5.5) 5x optical zoom lens and a 3-inch, 920,000-dot LCD

  • Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth support, and optional GPS and laser barcode reader accessories.

  • Features support for SD-WORM memory cards, which offer password-protected, tamper-proof image recording capabilities (aimed at law-enforcement or other high-security uses).

enter image description here


Samsung - January 2012

3 WiFi equipped models. No claims to ruggedness per se - wjhat that means to you and whether it can be added wih an external case is TBD.

  • WB850F ($379), WB150F ($229) and ST200F ($199) all have Wi-Fi, letting photographers send images straight from the camera to friends via email or upload them to a service like Flickr or YouTube.

  • WB850F: 21X optical zoom, 16-megapixel, 1080p video.
    Can run at hundreds of frames per second to recreate scenes in slow motion.
    Internal GPS. 3-inch AMOLED rear screen.

  • The WB150F: 14MP, 18X optical zoom and 1080p video recording.

  • ST200F 720p recording, 10X optical zoom.

Answered by Russell McMahon

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

What do you do with your camera clock time in relation to time zones?

Question

I live in the UK and spend most of my time here, apart from a short trip abroad once or sometimes twice a year.

This Sunday just gone we switched from GMT to BST, so our clocks went forward one hour. I updated my camera clock to match the new time, which is something I do every time the clocks change but someone said to me that this was a bad idea and that I should just leave it on GMT/UTC all year around. I guess this is partly due to GPS tracking (although I would normally use my iPhone which automatically updates it's time, so I need to sync my camera with my phone before I begin ideally).

I like the idea of updating my camera so it's on local time wherever I am in the world, but of course there is always the possibility of forgetting to do this. In the summer we are off on Honeymoon and will be in several different time zones, so the question is should I just make an effort to remember to update my clock time as I go, should I just leave it on GMT/UTC or is there a better way?

I am genuinely interested in what other photographers do to tackle this issue, especially with regard to travel and spending a few days at a time in different time zones.

I would also like to know how people handle the metadata when posting images online as the metadata could indicate a photo was taken on a different day due to a time zone mismatch. Also when reviewing photos I think it is often useful to know the times they were taken, especially with regard to sunset and sunrise, so knowing the accurate time can be important. Do you just have to manually work it out or is there considered to be a 'best practice' approach to dealing with this.

Very much looking forward to reading your responses.

Asked by Mark J P

Answer

I like to have date and times on photos reflect local times and date at the location.
Unlike another respondent, I like to be able to search for a photo tane "at out 3pm on the Thursady afternoon when I was in Xian" and, while there are other ways of cataloging and ordering, being able to search on local date and time is a bonus.

Travel from NZ involves long international flights (8-12 hours typical range unless going to Europe.)

I (try to remember to) change the camera date on the flight and change my wristwatch at the same time and take a before and after photo of the watch sequentially so I have a visual reference to the actual time of change in the photo stream.

Outbound from NZ the camera steps back in time so some photos will be out of time/date order. Majing the change early in the flight minimises the impact if I care. eg China is 5 hours behind NZ and is ~ 8-10-12 hours flight time (Hong-Kong / Shanghai / Beijing) depending also on route so the time impact on photo date-sort order is usually minimal.

In the past I used to assign a long file name prefix based on properly time ordered date.
Effecively YY MM DD HH SS in compressed form. It was useful but not so much so that I kept it going.

Related:

Fixing corrupted file date & time: Due to Microsoft's cavalier handling of file date & time format when copying from cameras to hdd you can find time offset by 12 hours and date by one day or both, on occasion. Confusing day and month is another sometime Microsoft specialty due to NZ using ddmmyy format as opposed to the usual US mmddyy format. Use of an EXIF to file date-time copying program fixs this. I use the excellent free jhead progran to do this.
Running "jhead -ft %1.jpg" in a [gasp!] DOS batch file will correct the date time to that shown in the EXIF for all files in a "folder". I believe that Microsoft Powertoys synch manager does this too but I have never tried it.

Travelling backup: I use the venerable and marvellous XXCOPY to incrementally copy in files from camera card to a netbook. When in tourist mode I carry the netbook everywhere and may download from camera card several times during the day. [Just because you are excessively paranoid about data loss it doesn't mean your cards won't fail :-)]. When XXCOPYing I change the archive attribute bit in the process, so that uncopied files can be identified, thus allowing an only-new files download incrementally AND leaving a backup copy on the camera card. I then copy from netbook to portable hard drive (possibly also during he day) and only then, if required, delete files on camera card. [On one journey I lost two of my 3 copies of photos (vanished with no clues, probably stolen) and still lost no photos.

Answered by Russell McMahon